Charlotte Cotton was in her third year of Art history at university that became interested in photography and film. He said that she didn't want to be a photographer but she wanted to be with photography. She went to V&A museum in london to get volunteer in the photography collection. She wanted to work at museum to open to public 5 days a week, so she waitressed during the evening and for 3 days a week for 8 months she was volunteer cataloguging the photography collection. she learned how to look.
I think its really interesting that she don't take, buy and accept photographs that period, it was just a pure time to look at photographs in terms of the collection history and history of photography.
She was working as an assistant curator of photographs then curator of photographs at the V&A for 12 years. She wants to address of photography as a medium to everyone and people to give their opinion about them. The important thing is about public access that we can decide the important of what we are looking at.
She read critiques of institutional ideologier by writers like Christopher Phillips and Douglas Crimp. Intellectual critique can not analyze a photography without institution or their histories.
Photographers are always working on their own independent practice is the type of photographic democracy. Photographers works are all about what the feel and its a most important thing.
New practitioners couch their photographic announcement in art world language and value of the productions associate with galleries than other photographic context such as magazines.
I think that is interesting that she separate photography from fashion and advertising.
She thinks documentary photography in newspaper and magazines are making problems, because something has shifted in how we look at image or real event but i think its not true cause all of these things are in one piece and they working together. all of them are link together.
Our media environment is changed and we deal with lots of different perspectives. Generally and Culturally there are lot of different assimilation of the world issue.
Its certainly more popular within art to support digital video forms of documentary.
She doesn't see fashion context as an art context and also she don't consider fashion designer as an artists. I dont think its right. because fashion is art, and all the designers are Art artists.
Contemporary art worlds interest in photography in the 1960s and early 1970s it was a shift from the value of the canonical history of photography. it becomes a heavy act.
In general i like her ideas and the way he answered the questions but in some part of this interview i was disagree with her specially in fashion part. as i said Fashion is art and all the designers are an art artist.